Catholic Relief Services (CRS) – Vitalizing Opportunities in Circular Economy and Sustainable Solutions in Lake Tanganyika (VOICES)

Opportunity overview

• Assignment: Intervention-level midterm evaluation
• Project: Vitalizing Opportunities in Circular Economy and Sustainable Solutions in Lake Tanganyika (VOICES)
• Countries: Tanzania and Zambia
• Locations: Kigoma Region in Tanzania and Mpulungu District in Zambia
• Project budget: US$4,403,260
• Project period: 1 September 2024 to 31 August 2028
• Period to be evaluated: Project inception to 30 June 2026
• Maximum assignment duration: Two months
• Provisional starting period: Mid-July 2026
• Final report due: September 2026
• Deadline for clarification questions: 30 July 2026 at 17:00, Dar es Salaam time
• Deadline for offers: 31 July 2026 at 17:00, Dar es Salaam time

Background

This Terms of Reference outlines the purpose, objectives and expectations of the intervention-level midterm evaluation of the VOICES project, implemented by Catholic Relief Services in Tanzania and Zambia.

The evaluation will assess:

• The continued relevance of the project design.
• The effectiveness and efficiency of implementation approaches.
• Stakeholder engagement and ownership.
• Progress towards priority outputs and early outcomes.
• Gender equality and youth inclusion.
• Inclusion of persons with disabilities.
• Environmental sustainability and climate-change considerations.
• Alignment with donor and government priorities.

About Catholic Relief Services

Catholic Relief Services is the official international humanitarian agency of the Catholic community in the United States. Founded in 1943 to support survivors of World War II in Europe, CRS now works in more than 90 countries.

CRS assists poor and vulnerable people based on need, regardless of race, religion or nationality. It works with governments, local partners, communities, civil society and private-sector actors to provide humanitarian assistance and promote sustainable development, health, education, livelihoods and peacebuilding.

CRS in Tanzania

CRS has worked in Tanzania since 1962. Its programming includes:

• Health, nutrition and early childhood development.
• Youth empowerment.
• Water, sanitation and hygiene.
• Agriculture and livelihoods.
• Systems strengthening.
• Youth and gender inclusion.
• Building resilient and productive communities.
• Strengthening local systems and partnerships.

CRS in Zambia

CRS began working in Zambia in 2000 following an invitation from the Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops. Its current initiatives include:

• Livelihoods, markets, agriculture and climate.
• Emergency programming.
• Micro-savings.
• Water, sanitation and hygiene.
• Partnership and capacity strengthening.
• Health and nutrition.
• Child health and protection.

CRS Zambia works with local churches, faith-based institutions, local organisations and the Government of Zambia.

About the VOICES project

VOICES is implemented by CRS in collaboration with Caritas Kigoma in Tanzania and Caritas Kasama in Zambia. Approximately 80% of project implementation takes place in Tanzania and 20% in Zambia.

The project aims to improve water quality in the Lake Tanganyika basin through sustainable and inclusive economic practices.

The project works to:

• Increase awareness and application of circular economy approaches among policymakers, businesses, consumers and civil society.
• Test and validate inclusive circular economy models under different local conditions.
• Promote waste-reduction strategies.
• Strengthen municipal waste-management systems.
• Create local livelihood and entrepreneurship opportunities.
• Promote cross-border knowledge-sharing between Tanzania and Zambia.
• Build sustainable, scalable and profitable circular economy businesses.

Through the Circular Economy Challenge Fund, VOICES identifies promising circular economy businesses and provides co-investment funding, technical assistance and connections to financial-service providers.

Priority is given to business models that reduce waste, improve community health and expand entrepreneurship opportunities for youth, adolescent girls, young women, women, men and other community members.

VOICES theory of change

The project’s Theory of Change is based on the expectation that:

• Knowledge of circular economy benefits among policymakers, businesses, consumers and civil society will increase and be applied.
• Inclusive circular economy models will be tested and validated under different local conditions.
• Government legal and policy frameworks in Tanzania and Zambia will continue supporting circular economy approaches.
• Private-sector investment in circular economy activities will increase.

These conditions are expected to improve water quality in the Lake Tanganyika basin because circular economy approaches reduce waste pollution.

Implementation progress reported

Tanzania

• A total of 58,775 people participated in project-led training, capacity-building and awareness activities.
• Participants included 29,226 females and 29,549 males.
• Activities included the “Taka ni Pesa” Social and Behaviour Change campaign.
• Participants included government officials, environmental champions, community influencers, pupils, teachers, media practitioners, SILC members, CSOs and CBOs.
• Seven early-adopter MSMEs were supported through the Circular Economy Challenge Fund in Kigoma Ujiji Municipal Council, Kigoma District Council and Uvinza District Council.
• An Entrepreneurship Support Organisation was engaged to provide technical assistance, mentorship and business-development services to:
  • 26 start-up circular economy MSMEs.
  • 30 ideation-stage circular economy MSMEs.

Zambia

• A total of 507 people—266 males and 241 females—benefited from school- and workplace-level skills-development interventions.
• Sixteen SILC groups comprising 97 members were trained in circular economy approaches.
• An additional 60 SILC members received intensive four-day training to start circular economy businesses.
• Ten influential leaders, including religious leaders, policymakers, farmers, fishers and media representatives, were engaged in waste-management approaches.
• A total of 209 pupils—102 males and 107 females—in Zambia and Tanzania were trained through Green and Environmental Clubs, supported by 36 administrators.
• Localised waste and watershed-management campaigns reached 155 community members—78 males and 77 females.
• A total of 145 roundtable discussions and forums were convened, including twice-yearly private-sector-led meetings.
• Twenty enumerators—11 males and nine females—conducted a baseline survey in Chibulula, Tanganyika, Mpulungu Central, Chilumba and Namukale wards.
• VOICES supported Mpulungu Town Council by purchasing two skip bins for bulk-waste collection.
• Technical assistance helped the council develop waste-management regulations covering markets, fishing areas along Lake Tanganyika and other public spaces.
• Four structured action plans were developed to advance sustainable waste-management practices.

Key project stakeholders

Households and community members

Households in target wards are expected to participate in awareness activities and adopt improved waste reduction, reuse, segregation and disposal practices.

Women, youth and persons with disabilities

These are priority participant groups. Their engagement includes awareness activities, community initiatives, circular value chains, entrepreneurship opportunities, the CECF and related business-development support.

SMEs and MSMEs

Businesses are expected to adopt circular economy techniques, develop waste-reduction and resource-recovery models, receive mentorship and potentially access CECF support.

Waste and circular economy value-chain actors

These include waste collectors, aggregators, transporters, recyclers, repairers, re-users and processors involved in waste diversion and resource recovery.

Farmers and fishers

Farmers and fisherfolk are expected to adopt circular economy practices that reduce waste, reuse by-products, improve resource efficiency and reduce land and water pollution.

Government and local authorities

Relevant government stakeholders include municipal, district and town councils and departments responsible for water, education, harbours, fisheries, waste management and environmental governance.

Civil society and community-based organisations

CSOs and CBOs support awareness, community mobilisation, advocacy, inclusion, accountability and local circular economy activities.

Schools and green clubs

Schools and school clubs provide platforms for environmental awareness, behaviour change and youth participation.

CRS, Caritas and implementing partners

CRS, Caritas Kigoma and Caritas Kasama are responsible for implementation, coordination, technical support, MEAL, learning, accountability and CECF management.

Financial-service providers and market actors

Financial institutions, buyers, suppliers and service providers influence the viability and scalability of circular economy businesses.

Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals

The VOICES project is expected to contribute to SDG 12: Responsible consumption and production.

Evaluation coverage

The evaluation will cover ongoing and completed activities implemented during the first half of the project, particularly:

• Strengthening inclusive market systems.
• Investing in profitable circular economy businesses.

Geographic coverage

• Tanzania: Kigoma Ujiji Municipal Council, Kigoma District Council and Uvinza District Council.
• Zambia: Mpulungu District and Mpulungu Town Council.

Objectives of the evaluation

The evaluation will:

1. Assess progress towards priority LogFrame outputs and early outcomes, including which results are on track, delayed or require correction.
2. Examine variations by country, location, sector, sex, age and disability where relevant data are available.
3. Identify internal and external factors enabling or constraining implementation and early outcomes.
4. Assess the use of coordination, MEAL, feedback and learning systems for adaptive management and cross-country learning.
5. Examine the continued relevance and functionality of strategies relating to circular economy awareness, waste management, water-quality monitoring, local governance and inclusion.
6. Identify barriers and enabling factors affecting the participation, access and leadership of women, youth and persons with disabilities.
7. Assess the appropriateness, accessibility and readiness of the CECF and related business-development mechanisms.
8. Generate practical recommendations, lessons, promising practices and country-specific adaptations for the remaining project period.

Outcome indicators to be measured at midterm

Strategic objective 1

Increase and apply knowledge of circular economy benefits among policymakers, businesses, consumers and civil society.

• CSOs promoting circular economy awareness with EU support: Baseline 0; target 60%.
• LGAs implementing action plans, bylaws or regulations promoting circular economy practices: Baseline 0; target four.
• SMEs applying circular economy techniques or technologies: Baseline 0; target presented as 100 SMEs or 50%.
• Farmers or fishers applying circular economy techniques: Baseline 15%; target 60%.
• Households applying circular economy practices: Baseline 17.7%; target 60%.
• School Green Clubs implementing circular economy action plans: Baseline 4.6%; target 50%.

Strategic objective 2

Test and validate inclusive circular economy models under different local conditions.

• MSMEs or groups receiving EU support and applying circular economy business practices: Baseline 0; target presented as 100 MSMEs/groups or 50%.
• MSMEs or groups starting new circular economy businesses or activities: Baseline 0; target 150.
• Target beneficiaries actively participating in green or circular value chains: Baseline 30%; target 55%.
• Solid waste diverted from or removed from landfills and channelled into circular economy value chains: Baseline 70 tonnes per day; target 278 tonnes per day.

Evaluation questions

Evaluation question 1: Progress and implementation effectiveness

How and to what extent is VOICES progressing towards priority outputs, early outcomes, sustainability and impact, and which factors are enabling or constraining progress?

The evaluation will examine:

1. Which outputs and early outcomes are on track, delayed or require correction.
2. Internal and external factors explaining progress, delays and performance gaps.
3. The effectiveness of coordination, MEAL, feedback and learning systems.
4. How outputs and early outcomes contribute to envisaged impact and change processes.
5. How activities are integrated and coordinated within the sector and local context.
6. Government contributions to progress, coordination, ownership, effectiveness and sustainability.

Evaluation question 2: Relevance, functionality and inclusion

How relevant and functional are VOICES strategies for circular economy awareness, waste-management systems, water-quality monitoring, local governance and inclusion?

The evaluation will examine:

1. The functionality and local relevance of awareness, waste-management, water-quality and governance activities.
2. Alignment with stakeholder needs and contextual conditions.
3. Barriers and enabling factors affecting women, youth and persons with disabilities.

Evaluation question 3: CECF and business-support readiness

How well positioned are the CECF and related business-development mechanisms to support viable, inclusive and environmentally relevant circular economy models?

The evaluation will examine:

1. The appropriateness and accessibility of outreach, eligibility, selection, grant windows, technical assistance and business support.
2. Access to CECF support for women, youth, persons with disabilities, SILC groups, CBOs, MSMEs, farmers and fishers.
3. Early evidence that supported business models are feasible, inclusive, environmentally relevant and ready for implementation or scale-up.
4. The CECF’s contribution to project objectives and sustained impact.

Impact, coherence and EU-added value will not be assessed as standalone criteria. Any consideration of impact or coherence must be supported by available evidence and avoid premature attribution claims.

Cross-cutting considerations

The evaluation must examine:

• Gender mainstreaming and women’s empowerment.
• Youth and disability inclusion.
• Environment and climate change.
• Relevant SDGs and their interlinkages.
• The Leave No One Behind principle.
• Rights-based approaches.
• Accountability and adaptive management.
• How these considerations are reflected in project design, governance, implementation and monitoring.

Final evaluation questions, judgement criteria, indicators, data sources and tools will be agreed during the inception phase. Once the Inception Note is approved, the agreed evaluation questions will become contractually binding.

Preliminary methodology

The evaluation will use a non-experimental mixed-methods design combining quantitative and qualitative evidence.

Quantitative methods

At minimum, the quantitative component must include:

• A seven-day household waste assessment.
• Structured household and participant surveys.
• Institutional and stakeholder assessments.
• Comparison of midterm indicator values with baselines and approved targets.
• Review of project monitoring data.
• Disaggregation by location, sex, age, disability and other relevant characteristics where sample size and data quality permit.

Tools and definitions must align with the baseline methodology, VOICES LogFrame and indicator documentation.

The team should replicate baseline sites, definitions and measurement approaches where feasible. Any differences in timing, coverage, measurement procedures or data quality must be documented.

Sampling requirements

The final sampling strategy must be approved during the inception phase.

For household surveys and the seven-day waste assessment, the Inception Note must present:

• Sample-size calculations or justification.
• Confidence level and margin of error.
• Design effect, where applicable.
• Expected non-response.
• Replacement procedures.
• Sampling frames.
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
• Selected locations.
• Achieved samples and limitations.

Census, stratified or purposive sampling may be used for LGAs, institutions, schools, markets, MSMEs, farmers, fishers, waste actors, aggregators, CSOs and CBOs, depending on population size and diversity.

Qualitative methods

The qualitative component will include:

• Key Informant Interviews.
• Focus Group Discussions.
• Document review.
• Field observations.

Participants may include CRS and Caritas staff, local authorities, CSOs, CBOs, schools, green clubs, MSMEs, waste actors, farmers, fishers, financial institutions, market actors, women, youth and persons with disabilities.

Qualitative evidence must be analysed thematically by evaluation question, stakeholder group, location and cross-cutting issue.

Triangulation and analysis

Quantitative and qualitative evidence must be analysed together to identify convergence, divergence and explanatory patterns.

The evaluation must distinguish between:

• Observed change.
• Contribution evidence.
• Implementation progress.
• Contextual factors.
• Data and methodological limitations.

Unsupported attribution and generalisation from isolated anecdotes must be avoided.

Evaluation phases

Inception phase

Key activities include:

• Initial document and data collection.
• Document analysis.
• Inception interviews.
• Stakeholder analysis.
• Methodological design.
• Finalisation of evaluation questions, judgement criteria and indicators.
• Selection of data-collection and analysis methods.
• Planning of field activities.

The phase will include a remote kick-off meeting with CRS Tanzania and CRS Zambia.

Timeframe: Two weeks after formalisation of the consultancy.

Field phase

Activities include:

• Finalising and pre-testing quantitative and qualitative tools.
• Obtaining ethical clearances and permissions.
• Training enumerators and supervisors.
• Data collection in Kigoma Ujiji MC, Kigoma DC, Uvinza DC and Mpulungu District.
• Daily data reviews, spot checks and field debriefings.
• Data cleaning, de-identification and quality assurance.
• Preparation of preliminary findings.
• Remote debriefing with CRS Tanzania and CRS Zambia.

Timeframe: Three weeks after the inception phase.

Synthesis phase

Activities include:

• Final analysis.
• Answering evaluation questions.
• Developing findings, conclusions and recommendations.
• Preparing the draft and final evaluation reports.

Timeframe: Two weeks after completion of data collection.

Dissemination phase

Activities include:

• A webinar with time for questions and answers.
• Presentation of findings and recommendations.
• Report circulation.
• Submission of soft copies of presentations.
• Email receipts confirming report circulation.
• Submission receipts or URLs for relevant EC and other platforms.

Timeframe: One week after approval of the final report.

Required deliverables

Inception Note

The Inception Note must not exceed 20 pages, excluding annexes. It must contain:

1. Introduction, context, objectives, focus and intercultural considerations.
2. Reconstructed intervention logic in a LogFrame or alternative format.
3. Stakeholder map.
4. Evaluation methodology.
5. Data-collection tools and methods.
6. Consultation and sampling strategy.
7. Proposed case studies and field missions.
8. Methodological risks and mitigation measures.
9. Ethical rules.
10. Finalised evaluation questions and evaluation matrix.
11. Gantt chart and supporting work-plan narrative.
12. Annexes containing the ToR, documents consulted and people interviewed during inception.

The team must present the Inception Note remotely to the Evaluation Manager and Steering Committee.

Field-phase presentation

• Maximum length: 30 slides.
• Content: Key preliminary field findings.
• Timing: End of the field phase.

Draft final report

• Maximum length: 40 pages, excluding annexes.
• Timing: End of the synthesis phase.
• Structure: As specified in Annex V.

Final report

• Maximum length: 40 pages, excluding annexes.
• Must incorporate accepted comments on the draft report.
• Due within one week after receiving comments.

Final presentation

• Maximum length: 25 pages/slides, as stated in the ToR.
• Content: Key findings and recommendations.
• Due one week after approval of the final report.

Additional deliverables

The evaluation team must also provide:

• CRS-approved study plans.
• Ethical or Institutional Review Board approval documents, where required.
• Sampling plans and actual quantitative sample-size calculations.
• Soft copies of quantitative and qualitative tools.
• Training for enumerators and supervisors.
• A data-collection guide.
• Completed questionnaires, consent forms and qualitative notes.
• Raw and cleaned quantitative datasets with village-level identifiers.
• A codebook or data dictionary.
• Qualitative analysis matrices.
• A survey implementation report covering problems, solutions and lessons.
• An updated project indicator table as an annex to the final report.
• A completed evaluation-matrix evidence log.
• A short webinar with questions and answers.
• Dissemination-event participation and presentation files.
• Written responses to subsequent donor questions concerning the final report.

The ToR suggests allowing up to 1.5 Team Leader working days during the six months following report submission to respond to donor queries.

Data protection and report requirements

• The final report must not contain proprietary information or personally identifiable information.
• Direct and indirect identifiers must be removed from datasets, reports, presentations and externally shared products.
• Lists of communities must be placed in removable annexes.
• Reports must be accurate, evidence-based, professionally edited and ready for publication.
• Appropriate maps, graphs and other illustrations should be used.
• A map of the intervention area must be attached as an annex.
• Reports must follow the CRS Branding Style and CRS Editorial Style Guide 2026.
• Reports must be submitted in both Word and PDF formats.
• The contract and all reports must be in English.

Evaluation management and steering

The evaluation will be managed by the Tanzania-based VOICES Project Manager with support from an Evaluation Steering Committee comprising:

• CRS Zambia VOICES Project Manager.
• CRS TaMoLe Hub MEAL Project Manager.
• CRS Zambia MEAL Lead.
• CRS Tanzania MEAL Lead.
• CRS Tanzania VOICES Senior Project Officer for Knowledge Management.
• CRS Zambia VOICES Project Officer.
• Caritas Kasama VOICES MEAL Officer.
• Caritas Kasama VOICES Project Officer.
• European Union focal-point person.

The Evaluation Manager and Steering Committee will:

• Agree on the evaluation focus and questions.
• Facilitate stakeholder contacts.
• Ensure access to relevant information.
• Review and comment on reports.
• Provide feedback on findings, conclusions, lessons and recommendations.
• Support the development of a follow-up plan.
• Support dissemination.

For each report, the Evaluation Manager will provide consolidated comments or approval within five calendar days. Revised reports must be submitted within five calendar days of receiving comments, accompanied by a document explaining how comments were addressed.

Ownership of data and products

• All evaluation data will remain the property of CRS.
• Evaluation products must cite CRS and the European Commission.
• All tools developed and used for the evaluation will belong to CRS.
• Tools and products may not be used or shared with parties outside this assignment.

Required team composition and working days

The minimum staffing and working-day requirements stated in the ToR are:

• Senior experts: At least one evaluator; at least 60 total working days, including 20 mission days.
• Medium experts: At least two evaluators; at least 30 total working days, including 20 mission days.
• Junior experts: At least 20 evaluators; at least 20 total working days, including 15 mission days.

The Team Leader must have demonstrable senior evaluation expertise and provide at least 60 working days, including 20 field days.

Minimum expertise

The proposed team must include:

• A senior evaluator with at least 10 years of evaluation experience.
• A senior evaluator with at least five years of circular economy sector experience.
• At least one team member with five years of experience managing evaluation field data collection and training enumerators.

Gender balance at all team levels is strongly recommended.

Language requirements

• At least three senior and junior experts must be fluent in written and spoken English, as stated in the ToR.
• All field-team members working in Tanzania must be fluent in written and spoken Swahili.
• All field-team members working in Zambia must be fluent in written and spoken Bemba.

Administrative requirements

Bidders must provide:

• Proof of a business licence and EFD receipt.
• A copy of the TIN certificate.
• Proposed payment terms.

Ethical standards

The team, including evaluators, enumerators, translators, supervisors and subcontractors, must comply with the European Commission Evaluation Handbook, 2025 Edition.

The evaluation must uphold:

1. Independence, impartiality and disclosure of conflicts of interest.
2. Do-no-harm and risk-sensitive practice.
3. Respect, dignity and voluntary participation.
4. Informed consent and, where applicable, caregiver consent and child or adolescent assent.
5. Privacy, confidentiality and secure data protection.
6. Equity-focused, inclusive and gender-responsive evaluation.
7. Cultural sensitivity and respect for local languages and contexts.
8. CRS safeguarding and prevention of sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment requirements.
9. Methodological integrity, transparency and evidence-based reporting.
10. Responsible communication and accountability to participants and stakeholders.
11. Required ethical, government, institutional and community permissions before fieldwork.

Contents of the technical offer

The technical offer must include:

• A short introduction demonstrating understanding of the assignment and its main challenges.
• The proposed evaluation methodology.
• An explanation of how gender equality, women’s empowerment and other cross-cutting issues will be addressed.
• A risk analysis and mitigation measures.
• An explanation of the proposed team composition and competencies.
• Organisation and allocation of tasks.
• CVs of proposed experts, limited to five pages each.
• A summary showing the work and role assigned to each expert.
• A proposed timetable in Gantt-chart format.

The technical offer must not exceed 15 pages, excluding annexes.

Contents of the financial offer

The financial offer must provide a detailed budget covering:

• Professional fees.
• Reimbursable expenses.
• Travel.
• Fieldwork.
• Translation into Swahili and Bemba.
• Data collection.
• Taxes.
• All other costs needed to complete the assignment.

Bidders may use their own financial template, provided every cost is clearly itemised.

No separate ceiling for the evaluation contract is stated. The proposed amount must be inclusive of all fees and costs in Tanzania and Zambia.

Assessment of offers

CRS will apply an 80% technical and 20% financial weighting.

Technical proposals will be scored out of 100 points:

• Understanding of the ToR and services: 10 points.
• Methodology, quality control, mix of tools and assessment of challenges: 25 points.
• Tenderer qualifications and backstopping: Five points.
• Task organisation and timetable: 10 points.
• Expertise of the proposed team: 50 points.

The technical threshold is 75 out of 100. Offers that do not meet the threshold will be rejected, and only qualifying financial offers will be evaluated.

Clarification and submission instructions

Clarification questions

Questions must be submitted by 30 July 2026 at 17:00, Dar es Salaam time to:

Offer deadline

Complete offers must be received by:

31 July 2026 at 17:00, Dar es Salaam time

Late offers will be disqualified.

Submission email

Send the technical offer, financial offer and all supporting documents electronically to:

Required email subject

CRS_TZ_VOICES-MTE 2026 OFFER SUBMISSION

Invoicing and payments

Invoicing and payment arrangements will be discussed after selection of the vendor, under the guidance of the CRS supply-chain and finance teams.

Annexes provided in the ToR

The ToR includes:

• Annex I: Evaluation matrix, including evaluation design and evidence log.
• Annex II: Criteria for assessing offers.
• Annex III: Information to be provided to the evaluation team.
• Annex IV: Inception Report quality checklist.
• Annex V: Required structure of the final report.
• Annex VI: Final Report quality checklist.
• Annex VII: Planning schedule to be completed by bidders.
• Annex VIII: Baseline sampling and sample-size information.
• Annex IX: VOICES Logical Framework.

Documents to be provided include the project agreement, LogFrame, implementation plan, updated IPTT, indicator reference sheets, monitoring datasets, baseline report and datasets, learning-event reports, CECF proposals, EC Evaluation Handbook, CRS Editorial Guide and other requested documents.

The baseline reference includes 406 surveyed households, 43 fishers, 132 farmers, 87 schools, 25 waste pickers, 29 CSO/CBO representatives, 84 restaurants, 18 aggregators, 16 markets, two dumpsites, six institutions and approximately 150 SMEs and informal circular economy enterprises.

Important points requiring clarification

• The ToR gives a provisional start date of mid-July 2026, although offers are due on 31 July 2026.
• The main indicator table records baseline values of 15%, 17.7% and 4.6% for farmers/fishers, households and School Green Clubs respectively, while some annexed tables record zero.
• The US$4,403,260 figure is the VOICES project budget, not a stated ceiling for the evaluation contract.
• The annex order and some section numbering are inconsistent in the PDF. Applicants may wish to clarify these points before the question deadline.

RFQ/Tender Information and Attachments

For comprehensive information regarding this RFQ/tender, we invite you to download the attachments provided below. These documents contain all the necessary details, including specifications, requirements, and submission guidelines. Please review them carefully to ensure you have all the pertinent information needed to participate.

DOWNLOAD THE FULL TENDER NOTICE HERE

READ ALSO: All Tenders and